I
have been taking a self-directed home study course in evolutionary psychology. I
didn’t learn evolutionary psychology in college. When my copy of Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of
the Mind 3rd ed. by David Buss arrived I put it beside a copy of
Exploring Psychology: Sixth Edition in
Modules by David Myers.
I
made a side-by-side comparison of regular old psychology with new evolutionary
psychology – both thoroughly secular texts. I started at the top – with consciousness.
Myers’ index has 7 entries on consciousness; Evolutionary Psychology has zero entries on consciousness. What
about happiness? -- 6 entries in plain psychology; zero in evolution.
Personality
is covered extensively in the Myers text. The evolutionary text explains that “evolutionary
psychology is now grappling with ways to incorporate individual differences and
species-typical psychological mechanism within a unified conceptual framework.” Dreams - zero. Intelligence- zero.
Love
is discussed in both texts. Evolutionary psychology explains love it in terms
of waist-to-hip ratios and mate-switching hypotheses. Mating behavior gets 42 entries in Buss.
I wondered, “if Darwin’s idea transformed
everything, why is the evolutionary psychology text so thin and sketchy?” Why
are evolutionary explanations of human
psychology so shallow and why has it taken so long for evolutionary thought to
penetrate psychology?" It is because the implications are so astonishing.
Nobel
Prize winning molecular biologist and co-discoverer of the molecular structure
of DNA Francis Crick explained it well when he wrote: “your joys and your sorrows, your memories and
your ambitions, your sense of personal identity and free will are in fact no
more than the behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated
molecules. You‘re nothing but a pack of neurons. There is no ‘you’ separable or
separate from your body. More specifically, there is no ‘you’ separable from
your brain.”
The full
implications of evolutionary naturalism means that all our emotions serve ultimately sole to
help assure our genes survive to the next generations. ALL mental powers and
capacities - love (of people, art, music, literature), language, sexual
preference, faith (or lack therof), dreams, motivation, consciousness, and our of
self exists ultimately for gene-level survival and reproduction.
I think its
pretty significant to think that the theory of evolution hinges, not on the fossil record, but on a belief that everything human, all humanity throughout
human history must be explainable by variation, survival and reproductive
advantages in an unbroken line backwards through to the Pleistocene era (the a
blink of a geologic eye).